49.
50. 13.名無しのコピペ
51. 2014年08月28日 12:19
52. 従軍慰安婦問題(笑)
53.
54. 14.名無し
55. 2014年08月28日 12:19
56. 朝・日・ル・新・聞
「済州島で連行」証言 裏付け得られず虚偽と判断
朝日新聞・2014年8月5日
朝日新聞は、作家の「吉田清治」氏の「女性を慰安婦にするために暴力を使って無理矢理連れだした」との証言を元に十数回に渡って記事を作成していた
他の新聞社も吉田氏の証言を元に記事を作成していたが、産経新聞が吉田氏の証言に疑問を投げかけ、週刊誌も証言が「創作である」と報じた
産経新聞の報道直後、吉田氏に関係者の紹介及びデータ提供を要請したが拒否されたため、以降吉田氏を取り上げることをやめる
2014年4〜5月に済州島で調査を行ったが、吉田氏の記述を裏付ける証言は得られなかった
■読者のみなさまへ
吉田氏が済州島で慰安婦を強制連行したとする証言は虚偽だと判断し、記事を取り消します。当時、虚偽の証言を見抜けませんでした。済州島を再取材しましたが、証言を裏付ける話は得られませんでした。研究者への取材でも証言の核心部分についての矛盾がいくつも明らかになりました。
57.
58. 15.名無しのコピペ
59. 2014年08月28日 12:21
60. 今締め付けに締め付けて痺れ切らした朝鮮(北でも南でも)がブチ切れて先制攻撃してきた時
大義名分振りかざして正義の報復を行うところを一日千秋と待ってるところだけど、
先制攻撃をした連中自身が「これは罠だ」とか「我々ではなくて○○がやった」「卑劣な陰謀」
とか大声で喚き出すのは目に見えてる。陰湿なろくでなしどもだし。
61.
62. 16.名無しのコピペ
63. 2014年08月28日 12:23
64. 従軍()売春婦のデマはそれでいいけど
米軍慰安婦とライダイハンとホームレス強制連行の韓国版ホロコーストと戦後の日本人強姦虐殺と日本人拉致と
これらの朝鮮人が清算すべき諸問題の存在は無くならないぞ?
特に後者の二つは反日してないでさっさと解決してくれ
北朝鮮は南朝鮮の一部って主張してるんだから
65.
66. 17.名無しのコピペ
67. 2014年08月28日 12:25
68. 証拠出せって言ったら証言があるニダ、と平気でウソの証言をするのが韓国人。
証拠は出せないし誰も見たことはないが、「証拠は山ほどある」と吹いて回る駐米韓国大使。
69.
70. 18.名無し
71. 2014年08月28日 12:27
72. 読売新聞が英文掲載
EDITORIAL / Asahi Shimbun makes long-overdue corrections over ‘comfort women’
7:45 pm, August 25, 2014
The Yomiuri Shimbun
After a review of its reports on the so-called comfort women issue, which has become a huge thorn in the side of Japan-South Korea ties, The Asahi Shimbun has admitted its mistakes in the reports—albeit partially—and retracted some of the contents.
The retractions allude to reports on remarks by Seiji Yoshida, who claimed to have forcibly taken away local women from Jeju Island, South Korea, to make them serve as comfort women. During World War II, Yoshida was said to be the former head of the mobilization department of the Shimonoseki Branch of Romu Hokoku-kai, an organization in charge of recruiting laborers.
In September 1982, the newspaper reported—without verification—the remarks of Yoshida, who claimed to have “hunted up 200 young Korean women in Jeju Island.”
Misperceptions about Japan
The report added fuel to anti-Japan sentiment in South Korea, and also became a basis of misperception of Japan spreading through the world. In its Tuesday morning edition, the Asahi concluded—for the first time—that Yoshida’s remarks were baseless, and finally retracted the newspaper’s reports regarding the remarks.
We cannot help but point out the correction should have been made at a much earlier stage. Doubts about Yoshida’s remarks have been raised as early as 1992. The newspaper’s negligence in allowing the issue to linger for more than 20 years is deplorable.
73.
74. 19.名無し
75. 2014年08月28日 12:29
76. 読売新聞英文掲載❷The Asahi has, by its own account, reported about Yoshida on at least 16 occasions. Historian Ikuhiko Hata raised doubts over Yoshida’s remarks in 1992, but the newspaper has long refrained from making a correction.
In March 1997, The Asahi Shimbun carried a special article on the reports about the comfort women issue. However, the newspaper only said it was unable to confirm the authenticity of Yoshida’s remarks.
Yoshida’s remarks were cited by a 1996 U.N. Human Rights Commission report compiled by Radhika Coomaraswamy, helping propagate a misunderstanding in the international community that the forcible recruitment of comfort women took place.
Another serious problem with the Asahi’s reports is the mix-up between comfort women and female volunteer corps.
In a front-page article carried in January 1992, the Asahi stated that “South Korean women became the major target of forcible recruitment conducted in the name of the female volunteer corps. The estimated number [of victims] range from 80,000 to 200,000.”
The report was issued just before then Prime Minister Kiichi Miyazawa’s visit to South Korea. It prompted the government to conduct an investigation into the comfort women issue, resulting in a statement issued by then Chief Cabinet Secretary Yohei Kono, which expressed the government’s “sincere apologies and remorse” to former comfort women.
77.
78. 20.名無しのコピペ
79. 2014年08月28日 12:30
80. ※7
完璧でワラタ
やるなロボ
81.
82. 21.名無し
83. 2014年08月28日 12:34
84. 読売新聞英文❸
In Tuesday morning’s edition, the Asahi admitted its mistake over the mix-up for the first time, saying that the female volunteer corps refers to groups of women mobilized for work in munitions factories and elsewhere during wartime and are “completely different” from comfort women.
“We have been working not to confuse the two since 1993,” the newspaper said in the Tuesday edition. However, the Asahi’s reports have prompted the false understanding that even girls of primary school age were recruited as comfort women.
The Asahi defended its coverage by saying in its two-page spread: “Little progress had been made in investigating the comfort women issue at that time. Some documents to which [Asahi] reporters referred contained statements in which the female volunteer corps was mixed up with the comfort women.” Then the special feature said that some other national dailies had also published articles containing a similar mix-up.
85.
86. 22.名無しのコピペ
87. 2014年08月28日 12:35
88. 2塁送球のビデオ消去しておいてよくもまあ
89.
90. 23.名無し
91. 2014年08月28日 12:37
92. 読売新聞英文❹
Assertions unchanged
We question the Asahi’s assertions about how so-called comfort women were kept at facilities to provide sex for soldiers. Though the heart of the matter was whether they were recruited by force, the national daily argued that great importance must be attached to the fact that those women were caught in a situation marked by “a coercive nature” with which they had been “deprived of freedom.”
In initial stages, the Asahi continued to insist the crux of the problem was that these women had been forcibly recruited, citing testimony from Yoshida and other sources. However, the testimony and data used by the paper as a basis for its reasoning were later disproved. Then the Asahi started to argue that the retention of those women in facilities had a coercive nature.
The Asahi’s assertion has remained fundamentally unchanged in this respect, as illustrated by its latest feature, which stated that the essence of the problem lies in the fact that “women were deprived of freedom in brothels, and their dignity was violated.”
There is no doubt that a large number of women, including those from the Philippines and Indonesia, had their honor and dignity injured during World War II. There may have been cases deemed inexcusable from a present-day human rights perspective, even if no coercive action was taken by the prewar government and the military.
Still, it is necessary to discuss two issues related to the whole controversy as separate matters—that is, how to deal with sex-related issues facing soldiers and whether the Japanese wartime military was involved in forcibly recruiting women for the provision of sex.
93.
94. 24.名無しのコピペ
95. 2014年08月28日 12:38
96. チョンが嘘をつく
日本人がそれは嘘だと言う
チョンが続けて嘘をつく
日本人がそれも嘘だと良いある事無い事をチョンのせいにし始める
チョンが嘘を付き無い事無い事チョンのせいにし始める
日本人がなんでもかんでもチョンのせいにし始める
チョンが有りもしない不確かなソースをこれ見よがしに提示してくる
日本がソースは確かかどうかちょとわからんがまぁ信じれそうな曖昧な当時の記録を持ち出す
チョンが捏造したソースを確かにするためにさらに捏造
日本人が昔の記録持ちだしてこっちは整合性がとれてると言い始める
チョン黙る
日本人が食い下がらない
チョン黙ってる
日本人が食い下がらない
チョン弱者の顔して日本がいじめるコール
アメリカ激怒
までが基本の流れ、日本も大概アホだろ、同レベルだな
97.
98. 25.え
99. 2014年08月28日 12:44
100. たとえが分かりにくい。
国際社会というかジャイアンアメリカだからじゃね?
101.
102. 26.名無しのコピペ
103. 2014年08月28日 12:47
104. 難しく考えんなよ
自国チームのユニフォームを着た他国チームが騒いでるのが慰安婦問題の本質なんだよ
105.
106. 27.名無しのコピペ
107. 2014年08月28日 12:47
108. ※22
証拠が無いのは隠滅工作したからニダ
つまり悪魔の証明でデマ流して特定の民族を攻撃してるのか・・・
どこまで屑なんだよ
109.
110. 28.名無しのコピペ
111. 2014年08月28日 12:50
112. インプレイだったら3塁に投げるのは当然
たとえが悪すぎる
113.
114. 29.名無しのコピペ
115. 2014年08月28日 12:53
116. ※7
ご苦労さま
117.
118. 30.
119. 2014年08月28日 12:53
120. どんな論理だよwそもそも強制連行はあっただろ。日本軍が設営、指定した施設で違法に集められた女性が兵士相手に売春させられていたんだぞ?実際集めたのが軍人かどうかなんて重要じゃないってなんでわからないかなあ。
出入国、占領地全域への海外移送、駐留地への連行等々、軍や官憲、内務省、総督府等の積極的な協力のもとで本人の意思に反して行われたこれらの行為はすべて犯罪。そもそも占領地全域に慰安所なんて違法な施設がゴロゴロ存在している時点で軍の関与を否定できるはずがないだろ。
121.
122. 31.名無しのコピペ
123. 2014年08月28日 12:54
124. たとえが悪すぎる
馬鹿がたとえ話持ち出すと話が混乱する典型
125.
126. 32.名無しのコピペ
127. 2014年08月28日 12:56
12